Government Integrity Project

NLPC “blows the whistle” on government officials and interest groups engaged in questionable activities. NLPC has filed formal Complaints with a variety of authorities and regulators, including the Federal Election Commission, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and Congressional Ethics Committees.

NLPC supports government integrity in two additional ways: by promoting the First Amendment as the basis for campaign finance reform, and by promoting use of the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).

Mark Modica
01/20/2011 - 13:28

Akerson photoGeneral Motors has announced that its Daewoo Group unit will now sell all of it vehicles under the Chevrolet name. The Korean Daewoo operation has suffered from falling sales and a reputation for shoddily built cars. So what is GM's answer to these challenges? Change the name!

The name change game has been played before when GMAC became Ally Financial. More recently, GM introduced the "all new" Chevy Sonic, which is an updated Aveo. This smoke and mirrors marketing philosophy will only take GM so far before the public asks, "Is this all GM has got?"

Carl Horowitz
01/18/2011 - 13:03

Rep. Steve King photoWhen Congress last November approved $1.15 billion to settle residual claims of racial discrimination by black farmers against the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), supporters lauded the vote and President Obama's signature the following month. This, they said, was justice belatedly done. Yet critics justifiably have argued that the class-action suit rests on an edifice of fraud. One of them, a member of Congress, Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa, is taking action. He's lined up a pair of unnamed witnesses, one a black farmer and the other a longtime USDA employee, willing to tell all. Early this month, Rep. King announced these individuals indicated a willingness to reveal to Congress that plaintiffs' attorneys engaged in an unscrupulous campaign to sign up co-plaintiffs, many of whom never farmed in their lives. The issue now is whether he can persuade his colleagues to hold a hearing.

Peter Flaherty
01/14/2011 - 13:27

McCrudden photoThe FBI's reported arrest of money manager Vincent McCrudden for allegedly making threats to kill members of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and other government officials prompts the question of what role, if any, anti-capitalist and anti-Wall Street rhetoric played in his actions. If the logic of the Left that was applied to the Tucson shootings - that Tea Partiers and Sarah Palin somehow had something to do with Jared Loughner's rampage -  should not President Obama and other politicians be held responsible for McCrudden's threats?

According to CampaignMoney.com, a Vincent McCrudden made a $2,300 donation to Obama for America on April 19, 2007.

Mark Modica
01/13/2011 - 14:30

autoworkerThe New York Times reports that the auto industry "overhaul" (AKA General Motors' bankruptcy) is about to "pay off handsomely" for UAW workers at GM. GM, along with Ford, is expected to announce profit-sharing checks for hourly workers this month. UAW president, Bob King, states that workers expect to get a piece of GM's profits.

Peter Flaherty
01/11/2011 - 15:41

Would a cut in the corporate tax rates really help create jobs? I debate this question today with David Callahan of Demos. CNBC hosts are Tyler Mathison, Sue Herera and Michelle Caruso-Cabrera. Here's a transcript:

Mark Modica
01/10/2011 - 03:53

UAW/GM logosThe positive news on GM has been so rampant that many risks factors to share price have been overlooked. It is tough to get unbiased opinions since most analysts work for the GM underwriters and TV networks receive millions of dollars from GM ad revenue. While GM has much good news to discuss, the very obvious risk factor of share dilution to benefit the UAW has not been mentioned.

Here are the facts regarding GM's plans for diluting shares in order to make a $2 billion contribution to the UAW benefits fund in GM Investor Relations' own words:

Peter Flaherty
01/06/2011 - 17:08

William Daley photoIt looks like the "Chicago Way" will continue with William Daley taking the White House Chief of Staff position formerly held by Rahm Emanuel. Daley is a particularly poor choice because he represents the nexus of big government, big business and the left-wing activist groups they enable and bankroll.

Daley is not a "centrist," nor is he "pro business," except when he is getting a piece of the action. Daley has carried the title of "Midwest Chairman" of JPMorgan Chase but he is not a banker or a businessman. He is a broker of influence. That is why JPMorgan Chase hired him in the first place.

Mark Modica
01/04/2011 - 10:23

The past few days have seen an approximate 7% rise in General Motors' Stock.  Much of this gain is attributed to Wall Street investment banks initiating positive coverage on GM. A further review of the coverage reveals a wide divergence in opinion between big banks that are profiting from the GM IPO and analysts who did not.

Alana Goodman
01/02/2011 - 15:13

Mollohan photoEthics groups are wondering whether the U.S. Department of Justice has become skittish when it comes to investigating members of Congress, after numerous congressional corruption investigations were closed without trial last year, reported the New York Times.

Since the department's case against the late Rep. Ted Stevens (R-AK) notoriously fell apart two years ago, officials have halted at least five other corruption investigations against high-profile congressmen, including Rep. Don Young (R-AK) and Rep. Alan B. Mollohan (D-WV), in photo.

Carl Horowitz
12/29/2010 - 13:27

caughtPatronage and corruption at the U.S. Interior Department's Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) is not exactly a well-kept secret. A widespread scam in a BIA loan program in Montana has brought home this reality with full force. And fully six persons have been sentenced as a result. On October 21, one of those persons, Dolly Diane Crowe, a former employee of the credit office at Fort Peck Indian Reservation, was sentenced in U.S. District Court for the District of Montana to two years in prison and three years of probation for theft and conspiracy to obstruct a federal audit. She also will have to make $143,120 in restitution, though the grand total of the scam was much higher. The details of the case underscore the necessity of better oversight at the BIA and indeed call into question why the agency should exist at all.

Syndicate content