This past January 14, the Justice Department and the International Brotherhood of Teamsters reached an agreement to end a quarter-century of federal oversight. Prosecutors believe a new era is overdue. "While threats persist, the organized crime influence the government found to have reached the highest echelons of IBT leadership in 1988 has long been expunged," announced Southern District of New York U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara. The deal, set for a hearing on February 11 before District Chief Judge Loretta Preska, phases in an autonomy plan over five years and institutes safeguards against corruption.
And now there are two dozen. This Tuesday, December 11, the Michigan House of Representatives passed, and Governor Rick Snyder signed, a pair of laws designed to protect employees from having to pay dues (or "agency fees" in lieu of joining) to a union in order to keep their jobs. The measures, one each applying to the private and public sector, make Michigan the nation's 24th state with "Right to Work" legislation. "We are moving forward on the topic of workplace fairness and equality," stated Gov. Snyder during an evening press conference following passage. Unions are taking the opposite view. About 12,500 opponents showed up at the State Capitol Building in Lansing to protest, with about 2,500, many of them shouting slogans, jamming the interior.
Scandal has a way of following the leadership of the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen (BLET) lately. In March 2008, Don Hahs, president of the Cleveland-based International Brotherhood of Teamsters-affiliated labor organization, was removed from his post by the Teamsters for embezzling around $58,000 in BLET funds. Now his replacement, Edward Rodzwicz, is in hot water of his own. On Tuesday, October 13, federal agents arrested Rodzwicz at his Avon, Ohio home on bribery charges. The previous week, prosecutors filed a criminal complaint against him in St. Louis federal court.
Jimmy Hoffa was a union leader who demanded results. And it didn't matter too much how he got them. That style of governance carried over to the people who worked for him, some of whom apparently were prepared to knock off a few law enforcement agents. This past April, U.S. District Judge Todd J. Campbell in Nashville, Tennessee unsealed long-dormant grand jury testimony revealing several Hoffa supporters had planned to ambush and murder a group of FBI agents in that city. The plan never came off. But the details, contained in transcripts released to the public late in July, underscore the fanaticism prevalent among the late Teamster president's loyalists.
Winning a third term in office was the easy part for James P. Hoffa, president of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters.Few observers gave his perennial challenger, Tom Leedham, much of a chance.Aside from the advantages of incumbency and last-name recognition, Hoffa had outspent Leedham $3 million to $300,000, according to campaign forms filed with a federal election supervisor.But keeping corruption out of his union will be the hard part.Edwin Stier, the lawyer who headed the union’s internal reform operation during 1999-2004 believes that as long as Hoffa remains in control, the IBT will be anything but clean.“By the time I left, Hoffa and his people had abandoned its efforts to deal with corruption within their union,” Stier told Union Corruption Update in an exclusive interview.“There have been no Teamster-initiated investigations of wrongdoing since then.”Stier is a partner in the law firm Stier Anderson, LLC, based in Skillman, N.J., with a Washington, D.C. office.
The ballots for Teamsters general president were mailed out on October 6.After the November 13 deadline for returning ballots, it will be all down to the waiting.Not too many people think Tom Leedham, now on his third try, will defeat incumbent James P. Hoffa, having received 40 percent of the total vote in a three-way race in 1998 and only 35 percent in 2001.But Leedham, 55, thinks this time around Hoffa’s track record will induce a great many among the union’s 1.4 million members to switch sides.In the meantime, Richard W. Mark, the union’s federally-appointed election supervisor, doesn’t think too much of certain people surrounding Hoffa.On October 3, Mark, acting on a complaint by Leedham, ruled that Stephen Mack, Hoffa’s director of industrial trades, had laundered $14,000 of member dues into his boss’s campaign coffers.It’s little coincidence, say Leedham’s people, that Mack’s brother, Chuck Mack, is a Hoffa running mate.Nor is it a coincidence that this August, supervisor Mark found Steve Mack’s brother-in-law, Rome Aloise, guilty of laundering $15,720 in dues money into Hoffa’s campaign. Nobody ever said a Teamsters election campaign was boring.
Dissenters within the International Brotherhood of Teamsters for months have been accusing President James P. Hoffa, Jr. of planning to steal his bid for re-election this fall.But they’re not hesitating to point out that certain local officials loyal to Hoffa are trying to do the same thing in their own campaigns.Chicago’s Local 743, they argue, presents a flagrant example.Richard Berg, an activist with Teamsters for a Democratic Union (TDU) challenging Hoffa’s loyalist incumbent Robert Walston for the presidency, says he was robbed – and that he’s got the documentation to prove it.
Teamsters for a Democratic Union has been fighting uphill battles since its founding in 1980, alerting fellow union members to corruption occurring within their ranks.Their workload isn’t likely to get any lighter, given that general elections are set to be held this fall.TDU has been a steadfast opponent of James P. Hoffa, since 1999 president of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters.They’re accusing Hoffa of pulling out the stops to defeat chief rival Tom Leedham and his “Strong Contracts, Good Pensions” slate.
Is it the truth or is it a whitewash?That’s the question rank-and-file members of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters ought to be asking in the wake of the release of the public portion of a new report prepared for the union, concluding that the IBT is free of organized crime.Union leadership, beginning with President James P. Hoffa, couldn’t be happier.But there’s an unpleasant reality:The report is in conflict with an earlier one released over a year ago.The extent to which the Teamsters can sway skeptics will determine how soon, if at all, the federal government will lift its more than decade-and-a-half of surveillance.
People saw it coming a mile away.The Teamsters’ James P. Hoffa and the Service Employees’ Andrew Stern each made good on their threats to take their unions out of the AFL-CIO at the start of that labor federation’s 50th anniversary convention in Chicago.In the process, they and several other dissenting unions have left observers wondering if the fortunes of organized labor have been irrevocably damaged.While that’s a possibility, the most likely long-run outcome probably will be the opposite.Indeed, unions may emerge with more members, revenues and political clout.As for battling corruption, they don’t seem to view this as a high-priority item.But this requires some context. And the context is the convention.