Obtaining mortgage aid by claiming "discrimination" has become a high art. The problem is that someone always has to pay. Just ask Wells Fargo & Co. On July 12, the San Francisco-based bank, the nation's largest mortgage originator, agreed to spend $175 million to settle accusations by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) that for several years it steered black and Hispanic homebuyers toward high-cost loans, so it could charge excessive interest and fees. The agreement, in which Wells Fargo admitted no wrongdoing, ostensibly will defray borrower losses and expand homeownership opportunities in lower-income areas.
The Obama Administration has over-stimulated the electric vehicle battery market, as companies inspired by the flow of federal stimulus support don’t have enough customers for their products.
The government promise of a coming electric car (and truck) revolution, thanks to moves such as President George W. Bush’s signature to approve a $7,500-per-electric-vehicle tax credit and Congress’s passage of the Recovery Act, instigated a buildup of capacity and inventory for batteries. Now putrid EV sales – including the newly introduced Ford Focus electric – have put their battery makers in peril, according to the Detroit Free Press.
When Congress sent a seaport security bill to President Bush’s desk a few weeks ago, supporters were enthusiastic that our nation was giving top priority to a previously neglected area of national security.Shipping terminals and cargo containers, they noted, are ideal places where terrorists, with some inside help, could place a bomb, possibly of mass destruction.President George W.
As a transit union strike wreaked havoc on rush hour transportation in Los Angeles, transit officials insisted on increased control over the union's insolvent pension fund.Local 1227 of the Amalgamated Transit Union (ATU), representing 2,200 Metro. Transportation Auth. Mechanics, began their strike on Oct. 14.The union representing some 6,000 MTA drivers and train operators refused to cross the ATU's picket line, and an estimated half-million commuters have had to find alternative transportation since.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia on April 23 upheld President George W. Bush's Executive Orderrequiring federal contractors to post notices informing employees that they cannot be compelled to join a union or pay union dues spent for partisan politics or other activities unrelated to collective bargaining.
The 2-1 decision overturns a previous ruling from the U. S. District Court for the District of Columbia that invalidated the President's Executive Order. In addition to defending the order as amicus curiae in the case, the National Right to Work Foundation had called upon the Bush Administration to appeal the District Court's original decision and delivered over 100,000 signed grassroots petitions urging President Bush to defend his Executive Order from union attack.
"This ruling is a step toward informing employees they have the right not to be shaken down to pay for union political activities," stated Stefan Gleason, Vice President of the National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation. "No employee should be forced to fund a political agenda they abhor as a job condition."
Pres. George W. Bush, on Feb. 3, proposed adding $8.3 million and 75 new staffers to better protect union members rights and promote the financial accountability of union officials.
At a press conference announcing the Dept. of Labors proposed budget for fiscal year 2004, Deputy Secy. of Labor Cameron D. Findlay said that the Ofc. of Labor-Mgmt. Standards (OLMS) would receive an extra $6.1 million, along with the new staff, to improve the OLMS enforcement of the Labor-Mgmt. Reporting & Disclosure Act (LMRDA). Also known as the Landrum-Griffin Act, that 1959 law mandates free and fair local union elections, and requires union officials to annually report the finances of their unions to DOL.
As reported in the last UCU issue, U.S. Dist. Judge Henry H. Kennedy, Jr. (D.D.C., Clinton) struck down President Bush's Executive Order 13201 Jan. requiring fed. contractors to post notices informing employees of their rights not to join a union or to pay fees for nonrepresentational purpose, under the Supreme Court's 1988 decision, CWA v. Beck. The Nat'l Legal & Pol'y Ctr. was written President Bush requesting that he and his Administration appeal Kennedy's adverse ruling.
Complaining that President Bush's executive order enforcing the U.S. Supreme Court's decision Communications Workers v. Beck imposes "substantial administrative burdens" on businesses, three unions and a federally funded union-established corporation have filed suit against the Bush Administration. The union suit seeks to prevent unionized employees of federal contractors from learning about their rights to be nonmembers and reclaim their forced union dues spent for politics. The United Auto Workers, along with the UAW-Labor Employment & Training Corp. and two affiliates of the Office & Prof'l Employees Int'l Union, filed the suit in May in the U.S. Dist. Court for D.C. against Sec. of Labor Elaine Chao, Sec. of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, and several other Administration officials.
According to BNA, the FY 2002 budget "blueprint" suggests that attention is being paid early in the Bush administration to longstanding concerns regarding a variety of Dep't of Labor programs that may be subject to fraud and abuse. Issued Feb. 28, the preliminary budget referred to three areas identified in the past by the DOL's inspector general as in need of attention. These include programs that provide benefits to workers, such as the unemployment insurance (UI) program; administration of grant funds; and foreign labor certification programs. DOL IG Gordon Heddell's spokesman said he "looks forward to working with" Labor Secretary Elaine L. Chao "and her management team to address these longstanding issues." Heddell, a 28-year veteran of the federal law enforcement system was confirmed IG by the Senate on Dec. 15.
The Nat'l Legal & Pol'y Ctr., a union corruption watchdog group, filed a complaint with the Fed. Election Comm'n Oct. 30 against Gore/Lieberman, Inc., AFL-CIO and Am. Fed'n of State, County & Mun. Employees for an apparent violation of federal election law. The complaint concerns a full page advertisement that appeared in the Washington Post on Oct. 11, which attacked Tex. Gov. George W. Bush's tax cut plan and listed 300 economists.
The ad stated: "Paid for by the working men and women of [AFSCME] and the AFL-CIO." It also said: "We, the undersigned, oppose the large-scale tax cuts that are the centerpiece of presidential candidate George W. Bush's economic proposals." It states: "Targeting the surplus to these families as proposed by Vice President Gore makes more sense." It said: "To waste that opportunity with this tax scheme would be economically and socially irresponsible."
The ad could be considered express advocacy or a coordinated "issue ad." Either interpretation of the ad results in a violation of the Fed. Election Campaign Act.