SEIU National Industry Pension Fund

Union Pension Fund Management Concludes Plan Is Critically Underfunded

SEIU logoAndrew Stern, president of the Service Employees International Union, often has emphasized his commitment to building a lean, efficient organization. His union and unions generally, he argues, need to aggressively cut costs and generate revenues in every way possible. Yet the SEIU is a union in major financial trouble. Its pension plan is no exception. Several weeks ago, the Washington, D.C.-based SEIU National Industry Pension Fund (NIPF) revealed in an April 30 letter to union leadership that the pension plan was in "critical status," or the "red zone." This "Notice of Critical Status" stated as follows: "This is to inform you that on March 31, the Plan actuary certified to the U.S. Department of the Treasury, and also to the Trustees, that the Plan is in critical status (the "red zone") for the plan year beginning January 1, 2009. Federal law requires that you receive this notice."

Union-Sponsored Pension Plans May Be Unstable Investments

One of organized labor’s strongest calling cards, politically if not economically, is that unions protect the long-term interests of employees.  If workers join, the argument goes, they will be far better off.  Yet rhetoric too often hasn’t matched reality, and perhaps nowhere more so than in the area of retirement plans.  That’s the conclusion of a recent study by Diana Furchtgott-Roth, senior fellow with the Hudson Institute in Washington, D.C.  Furchtgott-Roth, chief economist for the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) during 2003-05, authored a report released this month by the institute titled, “Unions vs. Private Pension Plans:  How Secure Are Union Members’ Retirements?”  Employer-sponsored pensions, she concludes, deliver more security for nonunion employees than union-managed funds do for their own members.

Syndicate content