collective bargaining

New Report Highlights Costs of Mandatory Collective Bargaining

Collective bargainingUnions do more than raise labor costs of employers with whom they negotiate. They also reduce wages and job growth in states where they are most prevalent. That's the conclusion of a new monograph published by the Washington, D.C.-based Competitive Enterprise Institute titled "The Unintended Consequences of Collective Bargaining" (see pdf). The authors, economist Lowell Gallaway (Ohio University) and law student Jonathan Robe, calculate union-associated "deadweight loss," on a state-by-state basis, over several decades. They concluded that a relatively high proportion of unionization, or union density, correlates with high rates of job loss. This suggests that by forcing employers to the bargaining table, federal labor law depresses entry-level worker prospects. It also suggests that state Right to Work laws mitigate this outcome.

Rangel Says Abolishing Collective Bargaining is Like 'Slavery'

Rep. Charles Rangel (D-NY) yesterday claimed at a Congressional Black Caucus event:

Collective bargaining is something that is so close to slavery in terms of abolishing it, that it is not an American concept to tell people that they cannot discuss their economic position.

Rangel is apparently oblivious to other forms of servitude, like paying your taxes while he doesn't pay his, and then have to listen to him express indignation when he is caught.

Syndicate content